Volume 21, Numbers 1 and 2

GATT-UR and Philippine Agriculture: Facts and Fallacies

Abstract

GATT-UR provisions on agriculture have been most controversial. Its ratification depends on the establishment of adequate “safety nets” to protect farmers from the anticipated adverse welfare impacts of the GATT-UR implementation. This paper argues that the global and Philippine trade liberalization in the spirit of GATT-UR will benefit the poor and farmers. Senate should therefore ratify the agreements to allow the government to attend their business of carrying out economic and institutional reform for sustainable economic growth.

Citations

  1. David, Cristina C., Ponciano Intal, and Arsenio M. Balisacan. 2007. Distortions to agricultural incentives in the Philippines. Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 48477. World Bank.
  2. Cororaton, Caesar B.. 1997. Simulating the effects of GATT-UR/WTO on the Philippine economy. Philippine Journal of Development JPD, 24, no. 2-a. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Full Issue

SHARE


Featured Image

The Philippine Journal of Development (PJD) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal published biannually by the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). It serves as a platform for disseminating policy-oriented research on development issues, including the economy, business, public administration, foreign relations, sociology, and political dynamics. 

P-ISSN 2508-0954 • E-ISSN 2508-0849 • https://doi.org/10.62986/pjd